As N Chandrababu Naidu was sworn in as the chief minister of Andhra Pradesh on Wednesday in Vijayawada, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar aroused political rumors.
In summary
1.Nitish Kumar does not attend Naidu’s Vijayawada swearing-in ceremony.
2. BJP cites “other commitments” as the reason for Nitish’s absence.
3.Nitish’s absence provokes debate and conjecture about politics.
Leader of the Janata Dal (United) and chief minister of Bihar, Nitish Kumar, gained notoriety on Wednesday when he failed to attend N Chandrababu Naidu’s formal swearing-in ceremony as chief minister of Andhra Pradesh in Vijayawada.
Allies and opponents reacted sharply when Kumar decided to remain in Patna, even though he had an excellent relationship with Naidu throughout the formation of the administration in Delhi.
Top NDA officials attended the glamorous dinner, but Nitish’s absence raised questions about the alliance’s cohesion and his turnabout. Opposition parties interpreted the BJP’s citation of “other commitments” as an indication of internal strife.
Spokesman for the RJD, Ejaz Ahmad, discussed the situation and said that Kumar’s choice revealed deeper problems inside the NDA. “Even though they made this decision internally, it is obvious that something is wrong with the NDA. The RJD leader predicted that the fissures would keep showing.
He pointed out that Tejashwi Yadav had anticipated these fractures prior to the declaration of the Lok Sabha election results.
Nitish’s absence was ascribed by Congress spokesperson Gyan Ranjan to discontent with the “disproportionate allocation of portfolios” at the most recent cabinet formation.
“Everyone was focused on Nitish following Bihar’s exclusion from the portfolio allocation process,” stated Ranjan. Although we were aware that this might occur, we never thought it would do so quickly.
He continued, “NDA will not stay at the helms for long.”
The BJP national spokesperson, Guru Prakash, dismissed the accusations made by the opposition, saying, “The days when we were blamed to be a political party with a stronghold in the north of the Vindhya Ranges are gone.” Karnataka already had a government, and the NDA is now more well-established throughout southern India.
He cautioned against media misinterpretations and claimed Nitish’s absence was caused by other obligations.