Live updates on Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea: AAP will petition the Supreme Court to overturn the Delhi Chief Minister’s bail in the excise issue.
Live updates on Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea: The trial court’s decision to grant the leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) bail in the excise policy scam case was stayed by the Delhi High Court, dealing a blow to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.
Live updates on Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea: Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal filed a petition against the Delhi High Court’s ruling to temporarily revoke his bail in the money laundering case related to the purported excise scam, and the Supreme Court on Monday set June 26 for hearings. A vacation bench made up of Justices Manoj Misra and SVN Bhatti declared that it would like to hold off on making a decision until after the high court has issued its ruling.
In an appearance on behalf of Kejriwal, Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi requested the lifting of the temporary stay on the bail order. However, ASG SV Raju, representing the ED, refuted Kejriwal’s argument and stated that the high court was set to rule on its stay request.
The national convener of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), who was detained by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on March 21, could have been able to leave Tihar jail on Friday if the high court had not granted the federal anti-money laundering agency an interim stay.
June 25, 2024, 03:46:43 IST
Live: AAP to petition the Supreme Court to overturn the stay on Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s bail
Arvind Kejriwal Live Bail Request: The Delhi High Court’s decision to stay Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s bail, which was granted by the trial court, was criticized by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Tuesday. The AAP stated it would appeal the decision in the Supreme Court.
Earlier in the day, the Delhi High Court halted the trial court’s decision to grant Kejriwal bail in the money laundering case involving the purported excise policy fraud in Delhi.
June 25, 2024, 03:16:45 IST
Arvind Kejriwal Live Bail Request: Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will decide on a bail order.
Arvind Kejriwal Live Bail Request: Regarding his bail request, the Delhi CM had appealed the Delhi HC’s decision to the Supreme Court. The hearing on June 26 had been retained by the SC.
IST on June 25, 2024, 02:53:34
Arvind Kejriwal Bail Plea LIVE: Delhi High Court: Arguments not ‘fully’ understood
Arvind Kejriwal Live Bail Request: The Delhi High Court declared that the trial court judge had not ‘fully’ understood the papers and arguments.
Delhi High Court stated, “Therefore, the impugned order is stayed.”
IST on June 25, 2024, at 02:42:37
Live bail hearing for Arvind Kejriwal: Delhi High Court revokes the lower court’s bail-granting decision
Arvind Kejriwal, Please Bail LIVE: Significant loss for Arvind Kejriwal. In the Delhi excise policy case, the Delhi High Court has stayed the trial court’s ruling giving him bail.
This court has determined that the vacation judge did not fairly consider the evidence in the file and the allegations made by ED. As a result, the application is granted, and the contested order’s operation is suspended.” The Delhi High Court observed.
IST on June 25, 2024, at 02:39:26
What the Delhi High Court says about Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea in real time Notes from Delhi High Court: The vacation judge did not address Kejriwal’s vicarious accountability under section 70 PMLA.
-The vacancy judge did not view the Satender Kumar Antil ruling from the Supreme Court correctly.
-This court also believes that Kejriwal was given bail by the SC for the Lok Sabha. His personal liberty could not have been restricted in contravention of the law when the High Court rejected his plea contesting his arrest.
On June 25, 2024, at 02:38:22 IST
Live: Delhi High Court labels ASG SV Raju’s arguments as “unjustified” in Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea
Arvind Kejriwal Live Bail Request: The court has taken into account the arguments put out by each party.
ASG SV Raju made reference to the trial court’s finding that the vacation judge overlooked the record.
This completely unwarranted observation demonstrated that the trial judge had not given the record any thought.
The Delhi High Court claims that the trial court’s ruling did not adequately address the PMLA’s required requirements.
