AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj raises questions on judicial bias concerning Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma’s children’s appointments by the Centre. Read more.
Senior Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and Delhi Cabinet Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj has sparked a major controversy by challenging the impartiality of the judiciary. In a recent statement, Saurabh Bharadwaj raises questions on judicial bias regarding the alleged connections between high-ranking judges and the Central Government.
Controversy Over Appointments of Judge’s Children
The AAP leader took to social media to highlight specific appointments that he claims suggest a conflict of interest. He pointed out that Ishan Sharma and Shambhavi Sharma, the son and daughter of Delhi High Court Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, were appointed as panel counsels for the Central Government in September and November 2025, respectively.
While addressing the media, Saurabh Bharadwaj raises questions on judicial bias, arguing that such appointments could potentially influence the outcome of sensitive political cases. He questioned whether a judge can remain truly independent when their children’s professional careers are directly linked to the Union Government’s favor.
Conflict of Interest in High-Profile Cases
The core of the allegation lies in the fact that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), represented by Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, is currently arguing cases against AAP leaders, including Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, in Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma’s court.
“If the Central Government and the Solicitor General play a role in the career advancement of a judge’s family members, it creates a massive cloud of suspicion over the proceedings,” Bharadwaj stated.
also read:- Sanjay Singh Questions Modi Government Foreign Policy,…
By highlighting these links, Saurabh Bharadwaj raises questions on judicial bias and the impact these relationships might have on the “fair trial” of opposition leaders.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma’s son Ishaan Sharma & daughter Shambhavi Sharma were both empanelled as Union Govt panel counsels (Delhi HC & Supreme Court) in Sept & Nov 2025.
The same Central Govt (via CBI) represented by SG of Central Govt Adv Tushar Mehta is appearing before… https://t.co/F51osVwsxj
— Saurabh Bharadwaj (@Saurabh_MLAgk) April 9, 2026
Concerns Over Participation in Political Events
Beyond the appointments, Bharadwaj also pointed out the ideological leanings of members of the bench. He alleged that Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma has participated in events organized by advocates’ wings associated with the RSS.
Again, Saurabh Bharadwaj raises questions on judicial bias, stating that for the public to maintain faith in the legal system, the judiciary must not only be impartial but must also be seen as completely detached from political or ideological organizations.
The Call for Transparency
The Aam Aadmi Party has consistently accused the Centre of using federal agencies to target the opposition. However, this direct attack on judicial appointments marks a new escalation. As Saurabh Bharadwaj raises questions on judicial bias, he calls for a more transparent mechanism for the appointment of government counsels to ensure there is no overlap with the family members of sitting judges.
The legal fraternity and political analysts are now debating whether these allegations hold weight or if they are a tactical move by the party to challenge unfavorable rulings. Regardless, the fact that Saurabh Bharadwaj raises questions on judicial bias has put the spotlight on the necessity of maintaining a “Lakshman Rekha” between the executive and the judiciary.
For More Hindi News: http://newz24india.com