Yogi Adityanath attacks Congress over Delhi protests, accusing the party of promoting disorder and questioning constitutional institutions amid the SIR controversy.
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has criticised the Congress over the recent demonstrations in Delhi against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Accusing the opposition party of encouraging disorder and questioning constitutional institutions, Adityanath warned that Congress could face further political setbacks if it did not reconsider its approach.
The chief minister’s remarks came amid an escalating dispute over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, police action against protesters and allegations concerning the functioning of election-related institutions. The Yogi Adityanath Congress attack has added to the political exchanges between the BJP and Congress over electoral transparency and democratic accountability.
Yogi Adityanath Refers to Congress’ Political Decline in Uttar Pradesh
Speaking to reporters on Monday, Adityanath pointed to Congress’ long absence from power in Uttar Pradesh. He said the party lost control of the state 41 years ago and had not returned to government since then.
The chief minister alleged that Congress was attempting to divert attention from its political difficulties by creating unrest and questioning democratic institutions. He argued that the party should examine its past decisions instead of blaming constitutional bodies for its electoral setbacks.
Adityanath also criticised what he described as the use of abusive language and public attacks against institutions. According to him, such conduct could further damage Congress’ public standing rather than help it rebuild political support.
Chief Minister Criticises Congress Over Delhi Demonstrations
The latest remarks followed protests in the national capital concerning Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and allegations related to the electoral process.
Adityanath accused Congress of contributing to disruption in Delhi and causing inconvenience to residents. He also alleged that the party was attempting to undermine the credibility of constitutional institutions for political reasons.
The chief minister maintained that disagreements with institutional decisions should not lead to efforts to weaken public confidence in democratic bodies. He said political parties needed to take responsibility for their own performance instead of attributing their difficulties to institutions.
The Yogi Adityanath Congress attack reflects the widening disagreement between the BJP and opposition parties over the handling of protests and criticism of election authorities.
also read:- UP Scholarship 2026-27: Applications Open For UG, PG And…
Congress Plans Opposition March to the Supreme Court
Congress was preparing to lead an Opposition march towards the Supreme Court to seek the intervention of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on several issues.
The proposed representation was expected to raise concerns about police action against protesters, the SIR exercise and the composition of the committee responsible for selecting election commissioners.
According to the supplied report, Chief Justice Surya Kant had declined a request from Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi for a meeting concerning the action against a youth-led protest in Delhi and alleged electoral irregularities.
Despite the refusal, the Opposition planned to continue with its proposed march and submit a representation addressed to the Chief Justice through a court official.
The move brought the debate over electoral processes and the treatment of demonstrators into sharper focus, with opposition parties seeking judicial attention to their concerns.
SIR Exercise Draws Attention to Electoral Roll Changes
The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls has become a major point of political contention. The supplied report states that approximately 130 million names have been removed from India’s electoral rolls during the exercise, prompting further debate over the revision process.
The protests against the Chief Election Commissioner have also taken place amid questions about internal discussions within the Election Commission of India (ECI).
An investigation cited in the report alleged that election commissioners S. S. Sandhu and Vivek Joshi recorded written objections and dissents at least 14 times between November 2025 and August 2026. It further alleged that concerns were communicated to the Cabinet Secretary and that election officials experienced restrictions on their access to ECI software.
The Election Commission responded that differing views and observations were a normal part of institutional deliberations. It also maintained that its digital platforms operated under strict data-security protocols.
These competing claims have contributed to the broader debate over the transparency of electoral procedures and the functioning of the Election Commission.
Yogi Adityanath Questions Congress’ Approach Towards Constitutional Bodies
Adityanath also criticised what he described as Congress’ tendency to challenge the judiciary when court decisions did not align with its expectations.
He alleged that threatening language, criticism of constitutional institutions and attempts to create disorder had become features of the party’s political conduct. He argued that disagreements over institutional decisions should be addressed through established democratic and legal channels.
Congress and other opposition parties, however, have raised concerns about electoral procedures and police action against protesters. Their proposed representation to the Supreme Court is intended to bring these issues to the attention of the judiciary.
The Yogi Adityanath Congress attack therefore comes at a time when questions about democratic institutions, the independence of election authorities and the rights of protesters remain central to the political debate.
Political Tensions Continue Over Electoral Transparency
The exchange between the Uttar Pradesh chief minister and Congress highlights the continuing political divide over the SIR exercise, protests against the Chief Election Commissioner and allegations of electoral irregularities.
While Adityanath has accused Congress of promoting disorder and undermining institutions, opposition parties have sought scrutiny of the electoral process and the police response to demonstrations.
The developments are likely to keep electoral transparency and institutional accountability in the spotlight. The Yogi Adityanath Congress attack adds another chapter to the ongoing political confrontation, as the government and opposition continue to disagree over how concerns about democratic processes should be addressed.
For More Hindi News:ย http://newz24india.com